Legal Opinion

Ballard v. Pacific Greyhound Lines

California Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1946No. L. A. 19598PublishedCited by 87 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

The plaintiff had a jury’s verdict of $10,000 in an action for personal injuries claimed to have been suffered when a Pacific Greyhound bus on which she was a paid passenger overturned after striking an automobile parked on the road. The trial court granted the defendant’s motion for a new trial. The order specified that it was granted on the ground of the insufficiency of the evidence to justify the verdict. The plaintiff appealed.

The bus was being operated by the defendant’s employee Hobert on Highway 101 between San Francisco and San Luis Obispo. Hobert had been employed as driver by the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Brooks v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Kauffman v. MaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Mazzotta v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Cahill v. E. B. & A. L. Stone Co.California Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Estate of GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by87 opinions

  1. City & County of San Francisco v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. In Re LifschutzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Horsford v. Board of Trustees of California State UniversityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  4. Richardson v. HamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Yarrow v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960

82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API