Smith v. San Francisco & North Pacific Railway Co.
California Supreme Court
Appeal from, a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial. J. M. Seawell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
At the election for directors of the San Francisco & North Pacific Railway Company, which was had at the annual meeting of the stockholders held February 25, 1896, the votes offered by Peter Gundecker, G. E. Wagner, and Sidney V. Smith, in whose names certain shares of stock stood on the books of the corporation, were rejected, and, at the close of the election, the chairman of. the meeting announced that Antoine Borel, A. W. Foster, Andrew Markham, P. N. Lilienthal, George A. Newhall, James B. Stetson, and John L. Howard, had been duly elected directors of said corporation for the year then…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- New England Trust Co. v. AbbottMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
- Hodge v. . SloanNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Guernsey v. CookMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
- Williams v. . MontgomeryNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Brewster v. HartleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- Klopstock v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Guilford Glazer v. Jerome S. Glazer and Louis A. Glazer, Jerome S. Glazer and Louis A. Glazer v. Guilford GlazerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- Gow v. Consolidated Coppermines Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1933
- Leadbetter v. PriceOregon Supreme Court · 1921
- Schreiber v. CarneyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1982
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.