Legal Opinion

HFH, LTD. v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 1975No. Docket Nos. L.A. 30382, 30383PublishedCited by 127 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TOBRINER, J.

We face in these mandate proceedings1 the narrow issue of whether a complaint alleging that a zoning action taken by a city council reduced the market value of petitioners’ (hereafter plaintiffs) land states a cause of action in inverse condemnation; we conclude that it does not. We also face numerous amici, some of whom urge on us significant changes in the law of liability, and compensation in public land use regulation; we have concluded that neither the state and federal Constitutions nor public policy compel or counsel these changes.

We take the facts in this case from…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Dalehite v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  4. Fletcher v. PeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1810
  5. Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by127 opinions

  1. City of Beaumont v. BouillionTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Careau & Co. v. Security Pacific Business Credit, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1990
  3. Agricultural Labor Relations Board v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Hensler v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Agins v. City of TiburonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979

122 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API