Parsons v. Smilie
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Haynes, C.
Appeal from judgment and order denying plaintiff’s motion for a new trial.
On the twenty-first day of November, 1887, plaintiff was the owner of four certain lots in North Pomona, Los Angeles County, and on that day executed and delivered to the defendant a deed of conveyance of the same for the consideration, therein expressed, of §1,073.60 then paid by defendant. The granting part of the deed was in the usual form, following which was this clause: “ This deed is given and accepted on the following conditions, which are to be binding on the party of the second part, his heirs and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Livingston v. TompkinsNew York Court of Chancery · 1820
- Henry v. TupperSupreme Court of Vermont · 1857
- Liebrand v. OttoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Bacon v. HuntingtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1840
3Cited by34 opinions
- Barkis v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Barkis v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Grand Prospect Partners v. Ross Dress for Less, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2015
- Quatman v. McCrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Fitzgerald v. County of ModocCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.