Legal Opinion

King County v. Hanson Investment Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 1949No. 30771PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinert, J.

Petitioner, King County, instituted proceedings in eminent domain to acquire full and unrestricted title to certain described real property, situated near Lake Sawyer, within the county, and consisting of 3.5 acres, more or less, designated as tract 92 on a plat of that general area. The public objects and uses for which this land was sought to be condemned are, as declared in the county’s petition, “a public park, camping, scenic view and recreational site for public use and enjoyment.”

Hanson Investment Company, a corporation, named as respondent in the petition, entered a formal appearance…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Fitzgerald v. County of ModocCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. MartinTexas Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Hollomon v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Georgia · 1929
  4. Johnston v. Medina Improvement Club, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Cummings v. Midstates Oil Corp.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1942

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Niemann v. Vaughn Community ChurchWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Niemann v. Vaughn Community ChurchWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Brown v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  4. King County v. RasmussenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  5. Newport Yacht Basin Ass'n of Condominium Owners v. Supreme Northwest, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2012

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API