Legal Opinion

Zindell v. Central Mutual Insurance

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 1936PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFritz, J.

The plaintiffs in this action seek to recover for damage to a garage located at the intersection of Flighways Nos. 14 and 15, as the result of a collision between a truck which was' owned by the defendant Arnold, and was eastbound on No. 15, and a truck which was owned by the defendant Britton Motor Service, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as Britton), and was northbound on No. 14. Each outfit consisted of a heavy four-wheel tractor hauling a two-wheel trailer. The collision occurred in the intersection on March 26, 1935, at 2:15 a. m. Both highways were concreted to a width of thirty-five…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Brady v. North Western InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
  2. Trautmann v. Charles Schefft & Sons Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Hamburg-Bremen Fire Insurance v. GarlingtonTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Bunker v. City of HudsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Hickman v. WellauerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1919

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Hauenstein v. St. Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  2. Stenger v. Hope Natural Gas Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. In Interest of Shawn BNCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1992
  4. Stenger v. Hope Natural Gas CompanyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Engel v. Dunn CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API