Legal Opinion

Parkford v. Union Drilling & Petroleum Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 24, 1931No. Docket No. 4312PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMPSON (R. L.), J.

This is an appeal from a judgment which was rendered in a suit for declaratory relief under the provisions of section 1060 of the Code of Civil Procedure, involving the construction of an oil-well contract, with which proceeding another action for materials furnished to the defendants for the drilling of the well, was consolidated.

The plaintiffs are the owners of an oil lease on lots 25 ' and 26 of Manila Avenue Tract in the county of Los Angeles, according to the map thereof which is recorded in book 5, page 160, of the maps of said county. On April 27, 1927, the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cox v. McLaughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  2. American-Hawaiian Engineering & Construction Co. v. ButlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
  3. Miller v. MurphyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Farrington v. A. Teichert & Son, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1943
  2. Sweeney v. American National BankIdaho Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Jeppe v. Blue CrossOhio Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. C. F. Bolster Co. v. J. C. Boespflug Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1959
  5. Ryan v. Fitzpatrick Drilling Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1959

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API