Legal Opinion

Ryan v. Fitzpatrick Drilling Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 22, 1959No. 18330PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Doyle

Plaintiffs in error, defendants in the district court, seek reversal of a judgment awarding the sum of $10,751.57 to the defendant in error who will be herein referred to as plaintiff.

Basically the controversy revolves around a written contract whereby plaintiff, a drilling contractor, had undertaken to drill a test well for oil and gas on leasehold property of defendants in a field called Grass Creek, Hot Springs County, Wyoming. Under the terms of the contract, defendants agreed to drill the test well for the sum of $20,000.00 plus a one-fourth interest in the completed well. The contract…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hammond v. CatonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1949
  2. Parkford v. Union Drilling & Petroleum Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
  3. Schmelzer v. ConditSupreme Court of Colorado · 1920
  4. Columbian Fuel Corporation v. SkidmoreCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1948
  5. Stearns-Rogers Manufacturing Co. v. Jackson Lake Reservoir & Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1916

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
  2. Threadgill v. PEABODY COAL COMPANYColorado Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. Fisher v. Community Banks of Colorado, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. AECOM Technical Services, Inc. v. Flatiron AECOM, LLCDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2021
  5. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. FisherSupreme Court of Colorado · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API