Ryan v. Fitzpatrick Drilling Co.
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Doyle
Plaintiffs in error, defendants in the district court, seek reversal of a judgment awarding the sum of $10,751.57 to the defendant in error who will be herein referred to as plaintiff.
Basically the controversy revolves around a written contract whereby plaintiff, a drilling contractor, had undertaken to drill a test well for oil and gas on leasehold property of defendants in a field called Grass Creek, Hot Springs County, Wyoming. Under the terms of the contract, defendants agreed to drill the test well for the sum of $20,000.00 plus a one-fourth interest in the completed well. The contract…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hammond v. CatonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1949
- Parkford v. Union Drilling & Petroleum Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
- Schmelzer v. ConditSupreme Court of Colorado · 1920
- Columbian Fuel Corporation v. SkidmoreCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1948
- Stearns-Rogers Manufacturing Co. v. Jackson Lake Reservoir & Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1916
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
- Threadgill v. PEABODY COAL COMPANYColorado Court of Appeals · 1974
- Fisher v. Community Banks of Colorado, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2010
- AECOM Technical Services, Inc. v. Flatiron AECOM, LLCDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2021
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. FisherSupreme Court of Colorado · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.