Miller v. Murphy
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
BURROUGHS, P. J., pro tem.
This is an appeal by the defendant John Murphy from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $600. The complaint sets out two causes of action; the first count alleges an express contract to pay the sum of $500, the second alleges the reasonable value of services rendered in the same amount. The cause was tried by a jury. Upon the conclusion of the testimony for plaintiff the court granted a nonsuit as to the defendant Nora Murphy upon both counts of the complaint, and also granted a nonsuit as to the defendant John Murphy upon the second count. The trial…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Tingley v. Times Mirror Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
- People v. BabcockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Lanigan v. NeelyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
- People v. Ho Kim YouCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
- Cowan v. AbbottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Parkford v. Union Drilling & Petroleum Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
- Murphy v. ZwiegCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929