Legal Opinion

C. F. Bolster Co. v. J. C. Boespflug Construction Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 15, 1959No. Civ. 23195PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHerndon, J.

In the court below plaintiff, C. F. Bolster Co., a subcontractor, recovered judgment against defendant, J. C. Boespflug Construction Company, the general contractor, and The Travelers Indemnity Company, its surety, for extra work allegedly done by plaintiff at defendant contractor’s direction in the construction of certain school buildings for the Los Angeles City High School District. By the terms of a subcontract, dated October 12, 1954, plaintiff undertook to do the interior and exterior plastering work on the project in conformity with and subject to the plans and specifications for the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Primm v. PrimmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. New v. NewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  4. Frank T. Hickey, Inc. v. Los Angeles Jewish Community CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. Medina v. Van Camp Sea Food Co.California Court of Appeal · 1946

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Blake Construction Co. v. C. J. Coakley Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Harrington v. McCarthyIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Sweetman Const. Co., Inc. v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Estate of Jones v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  5. MacOmber v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API