SS Kresge Company v. Davis
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
LAKE, Justice.
In all respects material to this appeal the ordinance of the City of High Point here in question is identical with the ordinances of the cities of Raleigh, Winston-Salem and Charlotte held valid by this Court in Kresge Co. v. Tomlinson and Arlan’s Dept. Store v. Tomlinson, 275 N.C. 1, 165 S.E. 2d 236; Charles Stores v. Tucker, 263 N.C. 710, 140 S.E. 2d 370; and Clark’s Charlotte, Inc. v. Hunter, 261 N.C. 222, 134 S.E. 2d 364. The businesses operated by the plaintiffs in the City of High Point, as described in their complaint, are substantially the same as those operated by the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Snowden v. HughesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Ex Parte VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Silver v. SilverSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Toomer v. GarrettCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- Dunn v. PateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
- White v. PateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- Richardson v. North Carolina Department of CorrectionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
- McCallum v. North Carolina Cooperative Extension Service of N.C. Carolina State UniversityCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.