Daniels v. Homer
Supreme Court of North Carolina
ActioN by B. T. Daniels against J. Q. Homer, heard by Judge Q. W. Ward, upon an agreed state of facts, at the Spring Term, 1905, of the Superior Court of Daee County. From a judgment in favor of the defendant, the plaintiff appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
Olakk, O. J.
The General Assembly of 1905 enacted chapter 292, “To regulate fishing in Albemarle and Pamlico Sounds and waters connected with them.” The first five sections of that chapter define and regulate the manner of fishing in various sections of the sounds. Section 6 (marked 5 in the printed act) is as follows: “That it shall be unlawful for any person to set or fish any net or appliance of any kind for catching fish within one mile on north or south side of a line five miles long, running west from center of New Inlet or Oregon Inlet, or on north or south side of a line five miles…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Lawton v. SteeleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- United States v. StowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- McCready v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Manchester v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Lawton v. . SteeleNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- State ex rel. Wilcox v. RyderSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- McCormick v. . ProctorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Skinner v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
- State v. DerryIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
- Pemberton v. City of GreensboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.