Legal Opinion

Roller v. Allen

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 27, 1957No. 451PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.

The parties concede that if Chapter 87, Article 3, General Statutes is a valid exercise of legislative power, the judgment below should be affirmed. On the other hand, they concede that if the Act is in violation of plaintiff’s constitutional rights, the judgment should be reversed. Counsel have confined the discussion solely to the constitutional question involved.

Plaintiff does not contend the North Carolina Licensing Board for Tile Contractors acted arbitrarily in refusing to issue him a license to engage in tile, marble, and terrazzo contracting. He does contend, however, that the…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Louis K. Liggett Co. v. BaldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. Jay Burns Baking Co. v. BryanSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. State v. BallanceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  4. State v. . BallanceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  5. State v. . HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. State v. WarrenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  2. In Re: Joseph Lee MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  3. Jernigan v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. In Re Certificate of Need for Aston Park Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  5. Smith v. KeatorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API