Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

State v. . Calcutt

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 21, 1941PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partDevin, J.

SEAWELL, J., joins in the opinion of DEVIN, J. Criminal prosecution heard upon indictment charging the defendant, in two counts, (1) with the ownership, sale, lease and transportation of certain slot machines and devices prohibited by law, and (2) with the operation and possession of certain slot machines (described as gambling devices) against the form of the statute in such cases made and provided and against the peace and dignity of the State.

To this bill of indictment the defendant entered a plea of guilty.

Judgment on the first count: Twelve months in the Wake County jail to be assigned…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. McGill v. Town of LumbertonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  2. State v. . HumphriesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  3. State v. Perkins.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  4. State v. . MalpassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  5. McCormick v. . ProctorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. State v. . MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  2. State v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  3. State v. GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  4. Spaugh v. City of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  5. State v. RhinehartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API