Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Allright Parking of Cleveland, Inc. v. City of Cleveland

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1992No. Nos. 91-835 and 91-862PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.

In the case now before us, the court of appeals ruled that ninety-four of the withheld documents were not excepted from disclosure as trade secrets because they had been submitted as part of an application under R.C. 1728.06 for approval of a tax-exempt project, and thus had become part of the public record. We hold it was error for the court of appeals to reach that conclusion without first reviewing the documents in question in camera to determine whether the documents had, in fact, become, part of the public record, and thus had lost their protection as trade secrets not subject to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. National Broadcasting Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State ex rel. Margolius v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1992

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Plain Dealer v. Ohio Dept. of InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State ex rel. Besser v. Ohio State UniversityOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State ex rel. The Plain Dealer v. Ohio Dept. of Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Ohio Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  5. State ex rel. Dispatch Printing Co. v. City of ColumbusOhio Supreme Court · 2000

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API