State ex rel. Margolius v. City of Cleveland
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.
This action requires a comprehensive review of State, ex rel. Recodat, v. Buchanan (1989), 46 Ohio St.3d 163, 546 N.E.2d 203, a decision in which we declared that “ * * * neither R.C. 149.43(B) nor 9.01 requires a public office to provide to the public * * * actual copies of the means of storage of public information [i.e., computer tapes].” Id. at 165, 546 N.E.2d at 205. We reached that conclusion in order to protect the proprietary interests of a third party in a computer software program that had been the subject of the Public Records Act request in that case. Id. Although the parties…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State ex rel. Cincinnati Post v. SchweikertOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- State ex rel. Recodat Co. v. BuchananOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- State ex rel. Harmon v. BenderOhio Supreme Court · 1986
3Cited by33 opinions
- State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Hamilton CountyOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- State ex rel. Warren Newspapers, Inc. v. HutsonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Kish v. City of AkronOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- State Ex Rel. Data Trace Information Services, L.L.C. v. Cuyahoga County Fiscal OfficerOhio Supreme Court · 2012
- State ex rel. Wadd v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1998
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.