Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Margolius v. City of Cleveland

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1992No. 91-367PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.

This action requires a comprehensive review of State, ex rel. Recodat, v. Buchanan (1989), 46 Ohio St.3d 163, 546 N.E.2d 203, a decision in which we declared that “ * * * neither R.C. 149.43(B) nor 9.01 requires a public office to provide to the public * * * actual copies of the means of storage of public information [i.e., computer tapes].” Id. at 165, 546 N.E.2d at 205. We reached that conclusion in order to protect the proprietary interests of a third party in a computer software program that had been the subject of the Public Records Act request in that case. Id. Although the parties…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Cincinnati Post v. SchweikertOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State ex rel. Recodat Co. v. BuchananOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State ex rel. Harmon v. BenderOhio Supreme Court · 1986

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Hamilton CountyOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State ex rel. Warren Newspapers, Inc. v. HutsonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Kish v. City of AkronOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State Ex Rel. Data Trace Information Services, L.L.C. v. Cuyahoga County Fiscal OfficerOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  5. State ex rel. Wadd v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1998

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API