Legal Opinion
Ohio Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided February 19, 2009No. 2008-0367PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO’Donnell, J.
Introduction
{¶ 1} This appeal arises from Am.Sub.S.B. No. 3, 148 Ohio Laws, Part IV, 7962 (“S.B. 3”), the electric restructuring legislation passed by the General Assembly in 1999. We remanded an earlier appeal to the commission in Ohio Consumers’ Counsel v. Pub. Util. Comm., 111 Ohio St.3d 300, 2006-Ohio-5789, 856 N.E.2d 213, (“CG & E Remand Opinion”) for further discovery of side agreements made in connection with a stipulation to establish a standard market-based service offer. The Office of the Ohio Consumers’ Counsel (“OCC”) asserts that the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio’s…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Office of Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1979
- Constellation NewEnergy, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- Monongahela Power Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- Ohio Edison Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- In re Application of Black Fork Wind Energy, L.L.C.Ohio Supreme Court · 2013
- In re Application of Columbus S. Power Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2011
- In re Application of Columbus S. Power Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
- In re Application of Columbus S. Power Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2012
- In re Review of the Alt. Energy Rider Contained in the Tariffs of Ohio Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.