Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Dispatch Printing Co. v. City of Columbus

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 2000No. 99-1521PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.

The issue presented by this appeal is whether the FOP could legally intervene in the mandamus action filed by the Dispatch, which seeks the release of public records pursuant to R.C. 149.43, based upon a provision in a collective bargaining agreement that requires periodic disposal of certain police records. Because our decision in State ex rel. Dispatch Printing Co. v. Wells (1985), 18 Ohio St.3d 382, 18 OBR 437, 481 N.E.2d 632, controls the disposition of this case, we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals.

Civ.R. 24(A)(2) provides that anyone shall be allowed to intervene in a cause…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State ex rel. National Broadcasting Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer v. Hamilton CountyOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State ex rel. Dispatch Printing Co. v. WellsOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  5. State ex rel. Wadd v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Cincinnati Enquirer, Div. of Gannett Satellite Info. Network, Inc. v. DupuisOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State ex rel. Toledo Blade Co. v. Seneca County Board of CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State Ex Rel. Merrill v. Ohio Department of Natural ResourcesOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Keller v. City of ColumbusOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  5. State ex rel. Horton v. Kilbane (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2022

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API