Legal Opinion

Long v. Five-Hundred Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1923No. 17189PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

This is an action brought by the respondents, Long & Harris, against the appellant, the Five Hundred Company, to recover in damages as for breach of warranty in the sale of an automobile truck by the appellant to the respondents. In a trial before a jury in the court below, there was a verdict in favor of the respondents, and from the judgment entered thereon the appeal is prosecuted.

*348The evidence on the part of the respondents, and which the jury saw fit to believe, tended to show the following facts: In January, 1920, the respondents were negotiating for a contract to haul saw logs and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Seitz v. Brewers' Refrigerating MacHine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Hausken v. Hodson-Feenaughty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Hoyt v. Hainsworth Motor Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1920
  4. United States Cast Iron Pipe & Foundry Co. v. EllisWashington Supreme Court · 1921

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Webster v. L. Romano Engineering Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Berg v. StrommeWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  3. E. Edelman & Co. v. Queen Stove Works, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  4. Davenport Ladder Co. v. Edward Hines Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
  5. Anderson v. OwensCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API