Hausken v. Hodson-Feenaughty Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Cross-appeals from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Hum, J., entered March 5, 1919, upon finding nominal and special damages, in an action on contract, tried to the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, C. J.
J. — The court below found for the plaintiff on his cause of action and rendered judgment thereon awarding special damages in the sum of $225, and nominal damages in the sum of $1, from which judgment both parties have appealed.
Defendant, which is the principal appellant, was a dealer in tractors in Oregon and Washington, and not a manufacturer. Despondent is a farmer of Spokane county, Washington, and about seventy years of age. The tractor in'question, previous to its purchase by plaintiff, had been looked at superficially by him. It had been examined by the president of the appellant, Mr.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Wright v. Computing Scale Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1907
- Wishkah Boom Co. v. Greenwood Timber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1918
- Morris v. Bradley Fertilizer Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1894
- Eichbaum v. Caldwell Bros.Washington Supreme Court · 1910
3Cited by17 opinions
- ATHERTON CONDO APARTMENT-OWNERS ASS'N BD OF DIRECTORS v. Blume Dev. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
- Larson v. Farmers Warehouse Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1931
- Luther v. Standard Conveyor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Long v. Five-Hundred Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1923
- Cannon v. Oregon Moline Plow Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1921
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.