Legal Opinion

Berg v. Stromme

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1971No. 41500PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHale, J.

Plaintiff bought a new Pontiac station wagon automobile but claimed that it had so many things wrong with it he felt justified in rescinding the deal. When he tried to return the car and get a refund, the dealer refused, saying not only that the sale carried no warranty of quality but that plaintiff had in writing waived all warranties of fitness, express or implied, and had acknowledged that he was buying without any guarantee whatever.

Seeking damages for depreciated value, costs of repairs and time loss, plaintiff brought this action against the dealer who had sold him the automobile. At…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  2. Vandermark v. Ford Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Ulmer v. Ford Motor Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Webster v. L. Romano Engineering Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1934
  5. House v. ThorntonWashington Supreme Court · 1969

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Zuver v. Airtouch Communications, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Zuver v. Airtouch Communications, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Schroeder v. Fageol Motors, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1975
  4. American Nursery Products, Inc. v. Indian Wells OrchardsWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Torgerson v. One Lincoln Tower, LLCWashington Supreme Court · 2009

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API