Legal Opinion
E. Edelman & Co. v. Queen Stove Works, Inc.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided March 24, 1939No. 31,907PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Gallagher, Chief Justice.
Appeal from an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial.
E. Edelman & Company, plaintiff, whose principal place of business is in Chicago, is a manufacturer of testing equipment and automotive replacement parts. The manufacture of rebuilt generators is incidental to its business. Queen Stove Works, Inc., defendant, whose principal place of business is in Albert Lea, manufactures oil-heating apparatus and gasoline pressure stoves. In 1935 it considered adding to its line the manufacture of windchargers, battery-charging units similar in appearance to a small…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Bekkevold v. PottsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. Strait Scale Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1929
- Goulds v. BrophySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- Guyandotte Coal Co. v. Virginian Electric & Machine WorksWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1923
- Cosgrove v. BennettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Atcas v. Credit Clearing Corporation of AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- O'Keefe v. RoutledgeMontana Supreme Court · 1940
- Luther v. Standard Conveyor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Henry Simons Lumber Co. v. SimonsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Inland Products Corp. v. Donovan Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.