Legal Opinion
Anderson v. Owens
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 29, 1953No. 13313PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POPE, Circuit Judge.
The Owens partners bought a tug from the Anderson partners. This suit was for breach of warranty of the condition of the tug. The dealings leading up to the contract of sale and purchase took, place at Seattle, Washington, although all the parties were residents of Alaska. The senior Anderson and A. E. Owens carried on the negotiations. Anderson had brought the tug to Seattle for repairs. It had been ¡purchased a year previously as a war surplus vessel. He met Owens at Seattle and negotiations followed which are described in the findings of the trial court as follows :
“7.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Seitz v. Brewers' Refrigerating MacHine Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Andersonian Investment Co. v. WadeWashington Supreme Court · 1919
- Long v. Five-Hundred Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1923
- Thomson & Stacy Co. v. Evans, Coleman & EvansWashington Supreme Court · 1918
- American Player Piano Co. v. American Pneumatic Action Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1915
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Noel v. United Aircraft Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1962
- L.K. Comstock & Co. v. United Engineers & Constructors Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Croft-Mullins Electric Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
- Lowell O. West Lumber Sales, a Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
- Producers Livestock Loan Company, a Corporation v. Idaho Livestock Auction, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.