Hoyt v. Hainsworth Motor Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Hall, J., entered July 9, 1919, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action on contract.
1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.
This is an action for damages for breach of an alleged implied warranty in the sale of an automobile. The case was tried to the court and a jury, and resulted in a verdict for the plaintiff. The defendant, at appropriate times, challenged the suffi*441ciency of the evidence and moved for a directed verdict. After the verdict was returned, motions for judgment non obstante veredicto and for new trial were served and filed. Both of these motions were overruled and a judgment was entered upon the verdict, after the plaintiff had elected to accept a judgment for less than the amount for which the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Reynolds v. General Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
- Hausken v. Hodson-Feenaughty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1920
- Hurley-Mason Co. v. Stebbins, Walker & SpinningWashington Supreme Court · 1914
3Cited by12 opinions
- Webster v. L. Romano Engineering Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1934
- Long v. Five-Hundred Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1923
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
- Hall v. Puget Sound Bridge & Dry Dock Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1965
- McMorries v. ClardyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.