Legal Opinion
Hayes Family Ltd. Partnership v. Planning & Zoning Commission
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided October 24, 2006No. AC 26726PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ROGERS, J.
The plaintiff, the Hayes Family Limited Partnership (Hayes), appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing Hayes’ appeal from the decision of the defendant, the planning and zoning commission of the town of Manchester.1 The main issue presented *216by Hayes to the defendant, and by Hayes and the defendant to the court, was whether Hayes’ challenge to a 1998 amendment of the Manchester zoning regulations (regulations) on the ground that there was improper public notice was time barred by General Statutes § 8-8 (r).* 2 The court dismissed the appeal as untimely pursuant…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- City of Waterbury v. Town of WashingtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Primerica v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Protect Hamden/North Haven from Excessive Traffic & Pollution, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Sheridan v. Planning BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- Manchester Environmental Coalition v. StocktonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. ThompsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Aspetuck Valley Country Club, Inc. v. Town of WestonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Warner v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Douglas v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Strand/BRC Group, LLC v. Board of RepresentativesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2022
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.