Legal Opinion
Warner v. Planning & Zoning Commission
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided March 23, 2010No. AC 29297PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LAVERY, J.
The plaintiff, Scott Warner, appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing his appeal from the decision of the planning and zoning commission of the town of Salisbury (commission). He claims that the court improperly dismissed the appeal because (1) he was not required to plead and to prove aggrievement with respect to a 2000 decision by the commission granting an alleged zone change to an owner of abutting property, (2) alternatively, if a showing of aggrievement was required as to the 2000 decision, he was aggrieved, (3) General Statutes § 8-8 (r) did not apply to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Protect Hamden/North Haven from Excessive Traffic & Pollution, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- State v. HillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Double I Ltd. Partnership v. Plan & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Brookridge District Ass'n v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Stafford Higgins Industries, Inc. v. City of NorwalkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Breen v. JudgeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- Eureka V, LLC v. Planning & Zoning Commission of the Town of RidgefieldConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Warner v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010