Legal Opinion
Douglas v. Planning & Zoning Commission
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided March 8, 2011No. AC 31626PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FLYNN, J.
The plaintiff Jonathan Andrew and the intervening plaintiffs, Sebastian Douglas, Gloria Lynn, Elizabeth Wasiutynski, Bohdan Wasiutynski, Angela Maggi, Judith M. Wick and Glenn LaFreniere, appeal from the judgment of the trial court dismissing their challenge to the defendant Watertown planning and zoning commission’s (commission) adoption of a text amendment to the Watertown zoning regulations (text amendment) to create a B-PCD262 zone permitting retail and office development in an existing industrial zone. The text amendment created what the trial court termed an “overlay…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Mystic Marinelife Aquarium, Inc. v. GillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Fort Trumbull Conservancy, LLC v. AlvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Sheridan v. Planning BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- Nizzardo v. State Traffic CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Windels v. Environmental Protection CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Stefanoni v. Department of Economic & Community DevelopmentConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Greenwood Manor, LLC v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014