Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Chrysler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 15, 2004PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed March 28, 2003, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Claimant was discharged from his employment as a set up technician after reporting late to work. Claimant had received various verbal and written warnings regarding his tardiness and was aware that any further incidents could lead to the termination of his employment. Substantial evidences supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of KingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. In re the Claim of McCulloughAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  3. In re the Claim of BiscardiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  4. In re the Claim of JeromeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of KazakaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. In re the Claim of Van BeekAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. In re the Claim of DintinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API