Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of McCullough

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 17, 2003PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed November 8, 2002, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Claimant, an accounts clerk, was terminated from her posi*568tion after she failed to return to work following a previously approved day off. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ruled that claimant had lost her employment under disqualifying circumstances. We affirm. It is well settled that an employee’s failure to return to work after the expiration of an…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of NikkhahAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. In re the Claim of KanberAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of ChryslerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. In re the Claim of KurtzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. In re the Claim of Paul-MarseilleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  4. In re the Claim of PetersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API