Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Dintino

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 15, 2005PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed June 28, 2004, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board finding that claimant lost her employment as a residential counselor due to misconduct. The record establishes that claimant was on probationary status for excessive tardiness and absenteeism and had been informed that any further tardiness would not be tolerated. When claimant…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of KingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. In re the Claim of ChryslerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. In re the Claim of RushAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of CucciaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. In re the Claim of Van BeekAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API