Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Van Beek
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided August 10, 2006PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed December 14, 2005, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.
Claimant was employed as a service and repair technician for a scientific equipment distributor until he was fired on May 11, 2004 for failing to report to work on time. Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ruling that claimant lost his job due to disqualifying misconduct. The record establishes that claimant…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In re the Claim of WayneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- In re the Claim of MillsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- In re the Claim of ChryslerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- In re the Claim of RushAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- In re the Claim of DintinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re the Claim of BiancoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- In re the Claim of CucciaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- In re HiltonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- In re the Claim of MorganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007