Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of King

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 10, 2004PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed February 28, 2003, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ruling that claimant lost her employment as a program aid for a not-for-profit organization due to disqualifying misconduct. Claimant was discharged after she reported to work an hour and a half late without notifying the employer. The record establishes that she had…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of SchnabelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. In re the Claim of BiscardiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of ChryslerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. In re the Claim of DintinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. In re the Claim of OrzelekAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  4. In re JaiyesimiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  5. In re JaiyesimiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API