Legal Opinion
Murphy v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided February 22, 2006No. 05-567CPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HORN, Judge.
Plaintiff, Colleen Murphy, M.D., a former officer in the United States Public Health Service Commissioned Corps, brought this action seeking relief under the Military Pay Act, 37 U.S.C. § 204 (2000). Plaintiff claims that she requested early separation from the Public Health Service Commissioned Corps, allegedly under duress and as a result of the coercive actions of her fellow officers. She argues that her separation was, in fact, a constructive discharge. Plaintiff seeks retroactive reinstatement, lost pay and allowances, active duty credit towards her retirement, refund…
2Cases cited89 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Bussie v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Woodson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Buser v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Flowers v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Johnson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.