Johnson v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SWEENEY, Judge.
Before the court is plaintiffs pro se Complaint (“Complaint” or “Compl.”), defendant’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction (“Def.’s Mot.”) under Rule 12(b)(1) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”), plaintiffs Response to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (“Response” or “Pl.’s Resp.”) and two affidavits, a “Negative Averment” (“Pl.’s Aff. A”) and “Affidavit of Truth” (“Pl.’s Aff. B”), accompanying plaintiffs Response, and Defendant’s Reply (“Def.’s Reply”). Plaintiff,' a federal inmate, seeks relief for the alleged breach of an…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Schweitzer v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Pleasant-Bey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Southern Nuclear Operating Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Nwogu v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Gibson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.