Legal Opinion

Utility Audit Co. v. City of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 22, 2003No. B163797PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

NOTT, J.

This appeal raises two central issues. First, should a refund of improperly collected sewer fees include interest? We hold that it should. Second, does the voluntary payment of such a refund, made without regard to any period of limitations defenses, equal a waiver of such defenses as to the payment of interest? We hold that it does not.

INTRODUCTION

The City of Los Angeles (City) appeals from a judgment entered in favor of Utility Audit Company, Inc. (Utility), in Utility’s consolidated actions to recover interest on refunds paid voluntarily by the City. Utility is the assignee…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Abbott v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Ass'n v. City of La HabraCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Schultz v. HarneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  4. Baillargeon v. Dep't of Water & Power of L.A.California Court of Appeal · 1977
  5. American Federation of Labor & Congress of Industrial Organizations v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Armstrong Petroleum Corp. v. Tri-Valley Oil & Gas Co.California Court of Appeal · 2004
  2. Bighorn-Desert View Water Agency v. VerjilCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Border Business Park, Inc. v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  4. Allied Fire Protection v. Diede Construction Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2005
  5. Los Altos Golf and Country Club v. County of Santa ClaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API