Legal Opinion
Schultz v. Harney
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 1, 1994No. B071678PublishedCited by 60 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CROSKEY, J.
Alan Schultz and Marcia Schultz, guardians ad litem for the minor, Christopher Schultz (collectively, Schultz) appeal from the judgment of the superior cotut dismissing Schultz’s action for legal malpractice and fraud against David M. Harney, after Harney’s demurrer to Schultz’s first amended complaint was sustained without leave to amend. Harney, who was Schultz’s attorney in an earlier action for medical malpractice, charged Schultz fees in excess of the fees allowable under Business and Professions Code section 6146, which limits the amount of attorney fees payable in…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Bernhard v. Bank of America National Trust & Saving AssociationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Careau & Co. v. Security Pacific Business Credit, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1990
- Slater v. BlackwoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Consumers Lobby Against Monopolies v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Goncalves Ex Rel. Goncalves v. Rady Children's Hospital San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Coscia v. McKenna & CuneoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Farmers Ins. Exchange v. ZerinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Wiley v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- Rakestraw v. California Physicians' ServiceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.