Legal Opinion

May v. Stallings

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 20, 1944No. 4 Div. 316PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

This case involves the question of whether appellee as defendant in a suit at law was due to have the affirmative charge given on each of the counts: One, for trover; two, for trespass; and three, for money had and received.

Plaintiff was the purchaser of the automobile described in the first two counts; of the complaint, and which was the foundation of the claim in the third count. The purchase was from the defendant and both plaintiff and defendant executed a conditional sales contract whereby the title was not to pass to plaintiff until the purchase price was paid.

This…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Weller & Co. v. CampSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  2. Keeble v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  3. Nabring v. Bank of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877
  4. Sharpe v. National BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
  5. Goad v. HarrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Morton v. National BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  2. Ex Parte MortonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  3. Joseph W. Hart, Luella F. Hart and J. Carl Russell v. The First National Bank of Birmingham, Birmingham, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1967
  4. Lauderdale County Co-op., Inc. v. LansdellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  5. Bolling v. CoffinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API