Legal Opinion

Morton v. National Bank

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided August 30, 1954No. 6 Div. 682PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Per curiam

There are two matters sought to be considered in this cause. One is to obtain a writ of mandamus to review the decree of the trial court dated August 1, 1953, adjudging that the pleas filed to the bill of complaint in equity are insufficient. The other matter is raised by an appeal from a decree of the court dated November 6, 1953, as amended November 19, 1953, overruling demurrer to the bill and to each and every aspect of it.

We will first consider the petition for mandamus.

Petitioners’ brief states that the plea which they urge was sufficient, and as to which the court erred in holding was…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Alexander v. HillmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Ex Parte WeissingerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
  3. Commercial National Bank v. Canal-Louisiana Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. Robinson v. PierceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
  5. Bolden v. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1925

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Dorrough v. McKeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
  2. Western Grain Company CasesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  3. Ex Parte MortonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  4. Brittain v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  5. Tri-State Corp. v. State Ex Rel. GallionSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API