Legal Opinion

Goad v. Harris

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 20, 1922No. 8 Div. 342PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSayre, J.

Appellees sued appellant in an action for damages alleging in several counts that appellant, while in possession of appel-lee’s auto truck, as bailee for trial pending negotiation for a purchase, had negligently misused and abused the truck, whereby it was greatly damaged. Counts in trover were added. The court charged out the counts in trover, and the jury found for defendant on the remaining counts. But on a motion for a new trial the court set aside the verdict and awarded a venire 'de novo. Thereupon defendant appealed.

The action of the court on the motion may be justified — must be — for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cobb v. MaloneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  2. Weller & Co. v. CampSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  3. Glaze v. M'MillionSupreme Court of Alabama · 1838
  4. Fail v. McArthurSupreme Court of Alabama · 1857

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Carpenter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
  2. W. M. Templeton & Son v. DavidSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  3. Lindsay Products Corp. v. Alabama Securities Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1946
  4. Mullinax v. HufhamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
  5. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Higbee Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1947

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API