Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Morton

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided August 30, 1954PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

75 So.2d 500 (1954)

Ex parte C. E. MORTON et al. Petition for Mandamus.

C. E. MORTON et al.

v.

NATIONAL BANK OF BOAZ.

6 Div. 682.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

August 30, 1954.

Rehearing Denied October 28, 1954.

Wade H. Morton and Maurice F. Bishop, Birmingham, for appellants.

Finis E. St. John, Cullman, and Frank J. Martin, Gadsden, for appellee.

2Per curiam 1

There are two matters sought to be considered in this cause. One is to obtain a writ of mandamus to review the decree of the trial court dated August 1, 1953, adjudging that the pleas filed to the bill of complaint in equity are insufficient. The other matter is…

Also in this document: Per curiam 2.

3Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Alexander v. HillmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Ex Parte WeissingerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
  3. Commercial National Bank v. Canal-Louisiana Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. Robinson v. PierceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
  5. Bolden v. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1925

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by26 opinions

  1. Dorrough v. McKeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
  2. Western Grain Company CasesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  3. Brittain v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  4. Tri-State Corp. v. State Ex Rel. GallionSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
  5. Ingram v. Omelet Shoppe, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1980

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API