Legal Opinion
Bauer Nike Hockey Usa, Inc. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided February 15, 2005No. 04-1158PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PROST, Circuit Judge.
Bauer Nike Hockey U.S.A., Inc. (“Bauer”) appeals a judgment by the Court of International Trade, which held that the United States Customs Service (“Customs”) correctly classified Bauer’s imported hockey pants under subheading 6211.33.00 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (“HTSUS”). Bauer Nike Hockey USA, Inc. v. United States, 305 F.Supp.2d 1345 (Ct. Int’l Trade 2003). Sports clothing classified under subheading 6211.33.00 carried with it duty rates of slightly above 16% ad valorem from 1998 through 2000. Id. at 1347. Bauer claims that its merchandise…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Orlando Food Corp. v. StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Mita Copystar America v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Pillowtex Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Medline Industries, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- CamelBak Products, LLC v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Lemans Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- David Peery v. City of MiamiCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020
- Archer Daniels Midland Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.