Legal Opinion

Bauer Nike Hockey USA v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided December 20, 2004No. 2004-1158Published

1Opinion of the Court

Error: Bad annotation destination United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 04-1158 BAUER NIKE HOCKEY USA, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee. Susan M. Mathews, Sidley Austin Brown & Wood LLP, of San Francisco, California, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With her on the brief was Richard M. Belanger, of Washington, DC. Of counsel was Robert Torresen, of Washington, DC. Amy M. Rubin, Attorney, International Trade Field Office, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of New York, New York, argued for…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Mita Copystar America v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
  3. Alan Bannister v. Bill Armontrout Attorney General of the State of MissouriCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
  4. Pillowtex Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
  5. Medline Industries, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API