Legal Opinion
Filet Menu, Inc. v. Cheng
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 4, 1999No. B118633PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CURRY, J.
Respondent Warren Cheng demurred to the first amended complaint for breach of contract of appellant Filet Menu, Inc. (hereafter Filet Menu), contending that its claims were time-barred. The trial court sustained the demurrer, reasoning that the tolling provisions of Code of Civil Procedure section 351, as applied to the facts alleged concerning Cheng, violated the commerce clause of the federal Constitution. We reverse.
Facts
Filet Menu’s first amended complaint alleges the following facts: Filet Menu is a California corporation whose principal place of business is in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Bendix Autolite Corp. v. Midwesco Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Cantu v. Resolution Trust Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1992
- Lewis I. Abramson World Coin Partners v. Joel F. BrownsteinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Patrick W. HaniganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Curcini v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Roman v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Coastside Fishing Club v. California Resources AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Hunt v. Enzo Biochem, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Lee v. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.