Legal Opinion
Coastside Fishing Club v. California Resources Agency
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 14, 2008No. A116026PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KLINE, P. J.
The trial court interpreted a statute as conferring authority on an executive branch agency to enter a contract to obtain private funds to defray the costs of implementing a statutory scheme for which the Legislature failed to provide adequate public funds. This appeal challenges that interpretation of the statute primarily on the ground that it is inconsistent with the rule against delegation of legislative power implicit in the doctrine of separation of powers.
FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS BELOW
On August 27, 2004, respondents, the California Resources Agency (Agency) and the…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- J. W. Hampton, Jr., & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Guerrero v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Curcini v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Outfitter Properties, LLC v. Wildlife Conservation BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Grossmont Union High School District v. STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Coastside Fishing Club v. California Fish & Game CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.