Legal Opinion

Roman v. County of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 9, 2000No. B133625PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

TODD, J.

Appellant Edward Roman appeals from an order dismissing his verified first amended complaint after the trial court sustained the County of Los Angeles’s (County) general demurrer, without leave to amend, to each of its eight causes of action. All of the causes of action in the amended complaint arose from County’s alleged discriminatory treatment of appellant, its employee. The trial court concluded that six causes of action were barred by the statute of limitations and the other two by appellant’s failure to exhaust his administrative remedies. Appellant’s primary contentions…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Careau & Co. v. Security Pacific Business Credit, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1990
  4. Goodman v. KennedyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Cantu v. Resolution Trust Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1992

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Surrell v. California Water Service Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  2. City of Industry v. City of FillmoreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  3. Ross v. Creel Printing & Publishing Co.California Court of Appeal · 2002
  4. Lee v. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  5. Walker v. Boeing Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2002

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API