Legal Opinion
United States v. Patrick W. Hanigan
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 19, 1982No. 81-1262PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHROEDER, Circuit Judge.
Patrick Hanigan appeals his conviction on three counts of aiding and abetting a robbery affecting commerce in violation of the Hobbs Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1951. His principal challenge is to the district court’s jurisdiction to try him under that Act. He also contends that several evidentiary rulings by the district court were prejudicial, that his prosecution violated the double jeopardy clause of the Constitution, and that the pretrial identification procedure was imper-missibly suggestive. We affirm the conviction.
FACTS
On August 18, 1976, three undocumented Mexican…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Stirone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Torres v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- United States v. Carlo Scott BagleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Francis Ordean Reese v. Thomas A. FulcomerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Harvey R. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.