Legal Opinion

In Re the Discipline of Hanratty

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 16, 1979No. 48374PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

These proceedings are before the Court on a petition for the discipline of Gerald Hubert Hanratty, an attorney at law, brought by the Administrative Director on Professional Conduct, at the direction of the Lawyers Professional Responsibility Board. The basic facts are not in dispute.

Gerald H. Hanratty has been a member of the Minnesota Bar since 1952. In 1965 Hanratty represented Jerry Agar in a tort action and thereafter in his business affairs. In 1968 Agar was divorced and his ex-wife was given possession of their house. The judgment provided that should Mrs. Agar remarry, the…

3Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ohio State Bar Ass'n v. WeaverOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  2. In Re Application for Discipline of HansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  3. In re Application for Discipline of HeinzeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
  4. In Re Disbarment of Samuel L. FriedmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  5. In Re Disbarment of HertzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by11 opinions

  1. Matter of Discipline of SchmidtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  2. In Re PrestonAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
  3. In Re Disciplinary Action Against KnutsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  4. Matter of Discipline of JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  5. In Re the Application for the Discipline of PetersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API