Legal Opinion

Matter of Discipline of Johnson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 23, 1987No. C6-86-212PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

Although the respondent Richard C. Johnson admitted service of a petition in which the Director of Minnesota Lawyers Professional Responsibility- alleged he had violated terms of a previously imposed and existing attorney discipline probation by additionally committing during the course of that probation acts constituting violation of the income tax laws — in and of themselves constituting attorney misconduct— he failed to either deny the allegations by answer or otherwise to controvert the charges contained in the petition. Such failure bears the consequence that all of the petition’s…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. In Re Discipline of BunkerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  2. In Re the Discipline of SerstockSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  4. State v. BlohmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  5. In Re Disciplinary Action Against KnutsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against SingerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  2. In Re Disciplinary Action Against GurstelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  3. In Re Disciplinary Action Against MunnsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  4. In Re Disciplinary Action Against YlitaloSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  5. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against ChryslerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API