Legal Opinion

In Re Preston

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided August 29, 1980No. 4889PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RABINOWITZ, Chief Justice.

This appeal involves a disciplinary matter in which we are faced with determining the nature and extent of the disciplinary action to be taken against Ray Preston. Preston was convicted of a felony, which, under Alaska Bar Rule 11-23, is included in the definition of “serious crime” and thus calls for the automatic commencement of bar disciplinary proceedings. Preston was convicted on his plea of nolo contendere to the offense of distributing cocaine to another. The superior court, after hearing, suspended imposition of sentence and placed Preston on probation…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. EricksonAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
  2. In Re FaheyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  3. In Re KreamerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Ohio State Bar Ass'n v. WeaverOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  5. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. DentonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Matter of RivkindArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  2. In the Disciplinary Matter Involving BuckalewAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  3. In Re BerkSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
  4. In Re the Disciplinary Matter Involving SimpsonAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
  5. In the Disciplinary Matter Involving SchulerAlaska Supreme Court · 1991

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API