Holstrom v. Mullen
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
Two actions were commenced by the plaintiff against the defendants, one seeking the recovery of damages for breach of contract and numbered in the superior court records 105,266 and the second designated by number 105,267, seeking to have a ten-year lease to a storeroom held by the defendants impressed with a trust in favor of the plaintiff. The complaint for damages alleges in addition to the fact of damage in a definite amount, that on or about August 10, 1921, plaintiff and defendants agreed that defendants should secure and take in their own names a lease on a storeroom in the Pacific…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Seymour v. OelrichsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Glass v. HulbertMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
- Lauricella v. LauricellaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Teich v. San Jose Safe Deposit Bank of SavingsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
3Cited by10 opinions
- Monarco v. Lo GrecoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Neet v. HolmesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Rutt v. RocheSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- Vogel v. ShawWyoming Supreme Court · 1930
- Keller v. RichbartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.